Is Freedom of Speech Really Free?

Is Freedom of Speech Really Free?

Length: 1297 words (3.7 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓

I sat in last period history class, my eyes fixed on the clock. “Twenty more minutes” I mumbled to myself, “twenty more minutes until freedom.” I was hardly engaged in the days discussion topic which was the current status of a post 9/11 world. I casually listened to the ideas of my classmates as I chewed my grape flavored bubble gum and doodled on my notebook, blowing bubbles and quietly popping them with my tongue in an attempt to pass the time. My teacher rambled on about how Saddam Heussein’s time to disarm is up and how Al Queda must be destroyed. One particular point of view from the boy sitting next to me brought my attention back to the discussion. “Actually, the U.S. gave Saddam Hussein the chemical weapons he is using, and the CIA helped him find the targets to use them on. It is their own fault he has access to these weapons and President Bush is moron. He doesn’t know how to get them back, he just talks big because he is trying to make a name for himself as an active President.” I was shocked by the boldness of the comment but it was nonetheless an interesting perspective. I looked to our teacher to see his response. Our usually very open history teacher was obviously offended. The class was silent for what seemed like an eternity, before he snapped “Actually you are wrong, and that kind of thinking will not be tolerated in this classroom.” My teacher then dismissed my classmate from the discussion. I was shocked that a student was punished for having a valid opinion and for voicing it. I began to wonder if freedom of speech is actually free, or if there is in fact always some consequence for having your own opinions.

The recent debate over terrorism and America’s reaction to it, has stirred controversy over the rights of free speech. Since the events of September 11, 2001, a large number of people have admitted that they believe the government should have a say over what is being broadcasted and printed The request for government censorship and suppression of free speech following 9/11, is nothing short of an infringement on our Constitution. As Americans, how can we claim be such strong defenders of free speech, and then turn around and put limitations on what we can say regarding the

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Is Freedom of Speech Really Free?." 123HelpMe.com. 19 Jan 2019
    <http://ambrosiacaffeandristorante.co.uk/view.asp?id=27152>.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

What We Really Want? Truth or Lie Essay

- Workers like telling lies, because it’s what the leaders want to hear .With clients like telling lies, because it’s what the customers want to hear .Telling lies among friends, because it’s what they want to hear .Couples lie to each other, because the it’s what they wants to hear. But sometimes you do not want them to lie to you, or you do not want to know that they lied. Trust has so many purposes, the trust we want to listen, the trust we do not want to listen, the truth we cannot say, and the truth we neglect....   [tags: the onion, political, freedom of speech]

Research Papers
887 words (2.5 pages)

The Importance of Freedom of Speech in College

- ... When freedom of speech is confined in higher institutions, it diminishes the budding adult’s importance of this crucial right. Freedom of speech was formulated by our founding fathers to insure that all citizens had a right to speak out against whatever injustices done to them without fear of punishment. However, the institutions that are responsible for the advancement of America’s future tax-paying citizens are denying them one of the most important rights of our country. Some universities are even digging their noses deeper and require their athletes to give them full access in their social networks....   [tags: Opinions, Censorship, Restraint]

Research Papers
806 words (2.3 pages)

The Freedom Of Speech : Texas V. Johnson

- ... We don’t have to agree. Most people would say that burning an American Flag is wrong and disrespectful (in my opinion, it is) but if you’re expressing yourself that’s all that matters, when it comes to freedom of speech. When it comes to Freedom of Speech, freedom of speech really isn’t meaning freedom to say or do whatever pops into our heads. We must understand the repercussions to our words and actions. I believe Adam Winkler said it best. He said “The reason for this “free speech federalism” and the implication of this phenomenon for constitutional adjudication are explored.” (Winkler, 2009) I found a law case that helps put this into perspective....   [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]

Research Papers
1612 words (4.6 pages)

The First Amendment Guarantees Freedom Of Speech

- ... Source #1 states, “The writings of philosophers such as Voltaire, the Englishman John Locke, and the American Benjamin Franklin helped propel revolutions in favor of individual freedoms.” Source #2 also explains how they were open to change and added to the First Amendment & the war threats. Source #2 states, “ He also proposed laws to make the nation more secure from foreign threats”. Also sourse #2 states, “ In other words, the Sedition Act directly limited freedoms allowed in the First Amendment.” The quotes states above show how the First Amendment was open to interpretation by the changes that were made on the situations that were presented....   [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]

Research Papers
1499 words (4.3 pages)

The Freedom Of Speech By Snyder V Phelps

- ... So why didn’t the Snyder family get the verdict to their favor by the Supreme Court but the civil court jury verdict went to their favor. As stated in the first paragraph the issue was the case was involved with the first amendment which only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction for such a case. The Supreme Court had review the case and looked at the issue brought into the case. The main issue of the case was “individual’s interest in suing to recover for the disruption of a family member’s funeral outweigh the disrupter’s First Amendment right to freedom of speech?.” So no, the individual interest of recovery cannot outweigh the First Amendment right to freedom of speech since the Free Sp...   [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]

Research Papers
1187 words (3.4 pages)

America 's Freedom Of Speech And Expression

- What is an American. The American people are each unique human beings, not one is like the other. Americans can be defined as people of self-expression and diligence in the workforce because they have multiple freedoms, rights to be themselves, as well as gratitude towards the United States of America. Many Characteristics can be used to describe an American but self-expression and hard work are the most important ones. These characteristics are what helped the American society grow into the strong community it is today....   [tags: United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt]

Research Papers
1120 words (3.2 pages)

Free Speech

-           In order to find truth to anything, one must make multiple suggestions, ask many questions, and sometimes ponder the unspeakable. Without doing so, there would be no process of elimination; therefore, truth would be virtually unattainable. Now, in our attempts to either find truth, express our beliefs and opinions, or generally use the rights we are given constitutionally, we are often being criticized and even reprimanded. Our freedom to voice our opinion(s) is being challenged, as critics of free speech are taking offense to what seems like anything and everything merely controversial and arguably prejudice....   [tags: Freedom of Speech Essays]

Research Papers
1253 words (3.6 pages)

Freedom of Speech

- Freedom of Speech   What is "Freedom of Speech"?  Finding out is my mission. Webster's defines "freedom" as: the condition of being free of restraints; exemption from the arbitrary exercise of authority in the performance of a specific action; civil liberty; exemption from unpleasant or onerous conditions; the capacity to exercise choice; free will; a right or the power to engage in certain actions without control or interference. Webster's also defines "speech" as: the faculty or act of speaking; the faculty or act of expressing or describing thoughts, feelings or perceptions by the articulation of words; vocal communication, conversation....   [tags: Expository Definition Essays]

Free Essays
2158 words (6.2 pages)

Iran Provides No Freedom of Speech on the Internet

- Introduction: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The first amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America can often be taken for granted. In many third-world countries, the idea of freedom of speech is in the back of people’s minds, but almost never brought to the forefront of issues facing the country and government....   [tags: Argumentative Essays]

Research Papers
1909 words (5.5 pages)

Essay about Freedom In America

- America is the universal symbol of freedom. But is it really free. Does the history of the United States stay true to the ideas of our forefathers. Or has the definition been altered to fit American policies. Has freedom defined America. Or has America defined freedom. I believe America was at first defined by freedom, then after time, America defined freedom, altering the definition to fit the niche it fits in, but still keeping key components so it still seems to be staying true to the ideas of America’s founding fathers....   [tags: Defining Freedom in America]

Research Papers
891 words (2.5 pages)

Related Searches

123helpme.com/search.asp?text=current+status">current status of the world?

For years, Americans went unchallenged and uncontested for their views about the government, the president, and politics. Television names such as Larry King and Ted Koppel devoted hours of tv air time expressing their hatred for this country. But now in a post 9/11 world, Americans are expected to have nothing but nice things to say about the government, President Bush, and the war on terrorism.“We are only free to say the things we are told to say, and which have already been censored and approved by the thought police” (Moyers). Instead of embracing and debating negative opinions of individuals we are criminalizing them and “‘Unfree speech’ may be a more accurate definition for our current politically correct society” (Payne).

Recently, the best-selling country trio the Dixie Chicks, came under intense fire for a comment that was made during one of their concerts in London. During the show on March 10, 2003, the lead singer of the band Natalie Maines, told the crowd, "Just so you know, we're ashamed the president of the United States is from Texas" (Cotterell). Even thought there was nothing constitutionally wrong with Natalie Maines’ opinion, the Dixie Chicks felt backlash. Over 6,000 responses regarding the comment were immediately posted on Kansas City’s WDAF AM radio website. Angry fans in Louisiana hired a bulldozer to demolish Dixie Chick CD’s and other related material while another country music station in Missouri put out a trash can for people to dispose of their CDs. Vandals attacked group member Emily Robison’s property as a result of the comment and Natalie Maines received hate mail and death threats from offended fans. If as Americans we are able to speak freely, then why did the Dixie Chicks face this kind of reaction?

The Chicks were not the only ones being condemned for their comments since September eleventh. Bill Maher, the host of the late night talk show ‘Politically Incorrect,’ was lambasted for poking fun at the hijacked planes. WALATv, more commonly known as ABC, cancelled the show immediately after an outcry from viewers when Maher called the U.S. “cowardly” despite its comical context.“I pay a horrible price for speaking out,” Maher said after people refused to acknowledge that his comment was a joke (Vernon). The termination of ‘Politically Incorrect’ was nothing short of an attack on the constitutional right to free speech and it is even more perplexing that the incident occurred in the heart of our nation’s capital Washington D.C., where WALA Tv is located. Bill Maher was not allowed to finish out his television contract because his humor was not in accordance with the majority of viewers. It is almost as if the public has more power than the first amendment for post 9/11 free speech. They were able to ‘blacklist’ Bill Maher and the Dixie Chicks. The popular actor and producer Sean Penn also experienced unfair treatment due to his antiwar stance. A lawsuit was filed just last month accusing film producer Steven Bing of “reneging on an agreement to pay Penn $10 million to star in a proposed movie, after he spoke out against the war with Iraq” (Whiteman). Sean Penn had recently visited Baghdad and took out “a full-page advert” in the Washington Post, in which he criticized President Bush for his war plans (Whiteman). How is losing a movie role due to holding an anti-war position constitutional?

Celebrities are not the only ones who have suffered consequences for speaking freely about 9/11. There has also been a large number of incidents on college campuses where professors have caused a stir over free speech. “Professors who speak their mind are taken to task, sometimes faced with loss of tenure and even threatened with lawsuits for their indiscretion. At last count, there have been over 100 reported incidents at colleges across the country” (Moyers). At Orange Coast Community College in California, Kenneth Hearlson, a professor of political science, discussed the nature of Islam with his class. Hearlson was suspended for the content of his lecture which simply addressed the issues revolving around 9/11. “In America we should have the equal right to offend, to speak our minds, to be honest with what we think and believe, regardless of how it impacts someone else” (Payne). To me, this is the embodiment of the first amendment of the Constitution, and the Constitution is where the true uniqeness and greatness of this country lies. However, the repercussions and consequences for my classmate, the Dixie Chicks, Bill Maher, Sean Penn, and Professor Hearlson for exercising their first amendment right, gives fellow Americans the false impression that limits on speech regarding world issues should be imposed. As American citizens we should not repress our thoughts and opinions for “fear of offending anyone, or for being sued-or jailed,” but we should be strong and independent, and exercise the right we claim to fight to the death to protect. (Payne).


Works Cited

Moyers, Bill. “Freedom to Teach: Academic Freedom After 9/11.” 15 Feb. 2002
< http://www.pbs.org./now/politics/acfreedom.html>

Payne, Jess. “Free Speech?” 8 Apr. 2003
<http://www.alankeyes.com/columns/payne/030408>

Cotterell, Bill. “Dixie Chicks controversy isn’t one for the history books.” Tallahassee Democrat (2003). 20 Mar. 2003
<http://www.tallahasse.com/mld/democrat/news/opinions/ 531114.html>

Vernon, Wes. “‘Politically Incorrect’ Pulled from ABC.” Free Republic (2001) 21 Sept. 2001
<http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f- news/527938/posts>

Whiteman, Bobby. “Hollywood’s Antiwar Message.” XTRAMSN:Entertainment, News and Gossip (2003). 14 Feb. 2003
<http://xtramsn.co.nz/entertainment/0,,3908-
Return to 123HelpMe.com