This Title is Censored
Should the First Amendment stop protecting hate speech? In Derek Bok’s “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, he argues that hate speech should be protected as censorship would be against the First Amendment. He declares “One reason why the power of censorship is so dangerous is that it is extremely difficult to decide when a particular communications is offensive enough to warrant prohibition or to weigh the degree is offensiveness against the potential value of communication.... if we were to forbid flags, it is only a short step to prohibiting offensive speakers” (Bok 67) What Bok is attempting to say is that we can technically declare anything as offensive. The idea of hate speech is varying on the opinion of a person rather than law. Banning “hate speech” is censorship of a history and culture, the violation of freedom of speech, and the arguments against it.
Beginning the argument, censoring hate speech is a violation of the First Amendment as it interferes with the American society’s freedom of speech and the freedom to expression. It is a clear violation of rules established by our founding fathers to protect against oppressive rulers and powers by making the people 's voice heard, to say what they want to say without tyrants to ban a different belief. as Bok stated “...If we were to forbid flags, it is only one step short to prohibiting offensive speakers” (Bok 67). Today this great nation argue that the NAZI swastika and the confederate flags were sign of hate and oppression, when they originally had a different meaning. The American flag was once a sign of hate speech in America, but not to Americans, but rather England in the revolution. If they were to ban flags, symbols, and peopl...
... middle of paper ...
...illogical as society of the time will decide if an argument is hate speech rather than to think freely and be able to decide was really is hate speech. Anyone who would disagree with an opponent over little things such as an immigration reform or allowing syrian refugees into our nation would be arrested for voicing their concerns and possible dilemmas with our modern world. Hate speech censorship is already at our doorstep and has been waving around in our political struggles for years, this censorship is nothing new but rather slander dressed as politician.
Our society will not learn what hate speech truly is or be able to differ it from arguments if it is hidden to the world. Just as the world censored the swastika and Buddhist were challenged, just as the American flag was a smear to England’s royal supporters, hate speech and censorship will break our society.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- As a sophomore attending a public university, the issues of racist speech and freedom of speech have been brought to my attention more than ever before. These issues are more than relevant. The debate over freedom of speech is of utmost importance to the college student and common citizen alike. College students today need, not only to know their rights, but they need to know how and when those rights should be used. They especially need to know how to use them in an academic setting for the purpose of intellectual and social growth.... [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]
1555 words (4.4 pages)
The Constitutionality of Separation of Church and State, Freedom of Speech, and the First Amendment in Times of War
- The United States Constitution was originally drafted in 1787 and this did not contain the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was ratified December 15, 1791 (McClenaghan 71). At that time, George Mason and others argued that it should not be included (Bender 27). James Madison believed that adding a bill of rights could give the government powers to take away people’s private rights (Madison 44). He stated that wherever power gives people the right to do something wrong, wrong doings will be done (Madison 44).... [tags: U.S. Government ]
1462 words (4.2 pages)
- All of us know about the crimes committed every day by people all over the world. Theft, assault, grand theft auto, underage drinking, fraud, prostitution, and rape. But what about crimes on the internet. Last year, SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) was introduced to the world. If this bill was passed, many sites would have to censor certain pieces of information, as well as remove a lot of the content already uploaded. SOPA would also crack down on terminating torrent sites, which are used to share files such as music, movies, video games, e-books, and whatever else is a digital file.... [tags: attempts against the first ammendment]
1665 words (4.8 pages)
- When you think about America, the first thing that comes to mind is liberty. Liberty of the government and its citizens is one thing that colonists exceedingly desired during the British oppressive regime. When United States gained independence, the Founding Fathers drafted the Constitution of the Unites States, a document that has been governing our country for more than 200 years. The constitution was drafted accordingly to ensure that people’s opinions were heard. What our Founding Fathers could not foresee is that in our 21st century, The Freedom of Speech not only gives a person such a massive power, but also an opinion even if it is immoral and goes against citizens’ values.... [tags: The First Amendment]
2199 words (6.3 pages)
- Persuasive Speech - Should Racist Speech Enjoy Protection under the First Amendment. Prejudice and racial stereotyping are two of this country's greatest problems today. Many people in our society have tried to find ways to eliminate or at least limit these types of behavior, but have met with very limited, if any, success. Because of the complex nature of racism and racist acts, coupled with the fact the first amendment prohibits the government from limiting the publics' right to free expression and speech, the Federal government has been ineffective in eliminating racist actions that pervade our society.... [tags: essays research papers]
1523 words (4.4 pages)
- Supreme Court Briefs - Civil Liberties The First Amendment gives United States citizens five distinct rights. One of which gives citizens the freedom of assembly. This right gives the individual right to come together and collectively express, promote, pursue and defend the common interest. There has been many Supreme Court cases that have defined this freedom for every citizen and the United States government. Edwards v. State of South Carolina The court case, Edwards v. South Carolina, started oral arguments in December 1962.... [tags: Assembly, Civil Rights]
1496 words (4.3 pages)
- Is the upholding of the American flag as a symbol of the United States more important than the freedom of speech provided by the First Amendment. Are there certain freedoms of expression that are not protected under the First Amendment and if so what qualifies as freedom of speech and expression and what does not. The Supreme Court case of Texas v. Johnson proves that the First Amendment and the freedom of speech are not limited to that of spoken and written word, but also extended to symbolic speech as well.... [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]
1782 words (5.1 pages)
- The Founding Fathers of the United States put into place a series of laws that protects the rights of the individual from the power of an ever expanding government. These laws, collectively known as the Constitution, protected future Americans from the invasive and tyrannical governments of the eighteenth century. More than two-hundred years later, the Constitution is more vital than ever in protecting the rights of every American from the government that we, the people, elect. The First Amendment of the Constitution protects the peoples rights of expression.... [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]
3116 words (8.9 pages)
- ... 629, 640 (1968); see also Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville, 422 U.S. 205, 212 (1975). The government’s interest in the well-being of its youth justifies the regulation of otherwise protected expression. F.C.C. v. Pacifica, 438 U.S. 726, 748-50 (1978). The Petitioner wanted to grab the church goers’ attention and that he did. But at what cost. The protest forced some families to go to another church and it left some of the children, who could not avoid it, with nightmares on Christmas Eve. The police were called out of fear of an altercation and the Ordinance was enforced justly.... [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]
1403 words (4 pages)
- ... ➜ Evidence: Net neutrality is the idea that all data should be transmitted equally by Internet service providers (ISPs). This will encourage new businesses to enter the market since they will not be treated unfair by companies favoring the big customers. Also, this will make sure the users on the Internet get the right to decide and choose what they like, never forcing to choose one specific brand. ➜ Impact: Net neutrality prevents monopoly, promoted competition and put a stop to price fixing or etc, which can in the end cause inflation or deflation, and protecting consumers, investors, and savers.... [tags: Freedom of speech, Censorship, Fraud]
1348 words (3.9 pages)