The entire American Government is based in the belief that all human beings are born with certain rights. People do not receive their rights from the Government; its function is actually to guard the rights we already have. Citizens are protected by the first amendment, which prohibits government from acting against anyone's rights.
The first amendment applies to every single citizen in the country, but most of them do not even know what it is about or what it means. The first amendment states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." In other words, the first amendment defends humans' rights to worship-or not worship- who ever they want, their right to express ideas and beliefs, and their right to unite and protest for what they believe right.
It is more than clear by now that people have the right to believe what they please and to expose their thinking without fear, but is this an absolute freedom? Is there any limit to it? I believe there is. Freedom of speech is a base for American society, but so are other values, and when there is conflict between the freedom of speech and these values, the government tries to regulate or balance the situation.
Freedom of speech cannot be considered an absolute freedom, and even society and the legal system recognize the boundaries or general situations where the speech should not be protected. Along with rights comes civil responsib...
... middle of paper ...
...t make sure they are not interfering with anyone else's interests.
Freedom of speech has many positive things, one of which is the help it gives on decision-making. Thanks to freedom of speech it is possible to express personal ideas without fear or restraints; therefore, all the perspectives and options will be on the table, giving people more opportunities to choose from. Nevertheless, everything in life has a limit, and the limit of freedom of speech depends directly on the consideration of the rights of others. People is free of believing what they want, thinking what they want, and even saying what they want, everything as long as they do not intrude or violate anyone else's rights. Under certain circumstances freedom of speech should be limited, and this is more than just a political action, this acts represent the urge for tolerance and the need for respect.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Although freedom of speech is regarded by many as an essential part of a democratic society, there is ongoing debate as to how far this right should extend, and whether it is acceptable to place limitations upon the right on the grounds that the speech could be classified as “hate speech”. Hate speech is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as “speech expressing hatred or intolerance of other social groups”. This covers a wide array of language, from racist or homophobic language, through to the publication of unsavoury views such as holocaust denialism.... [tags: Human rights, Democracy, Freedom of speech]
784 words (2.2 pages)
- Freedom of Speech Social media has taken us ages ahead when it comes to freedom of speech, and the internet has given more networks through which individuals can connect their ideas and feelings. Society can blog about government, post videos about topics we feel strongly about, and with the ability to get things off our chests through places like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. However, who makes the call about what is suitable and is pushing the limits of freedom of speech too far. Freedom to speak is “without restriction or limitation.” Still, this does not mean that individuals was allowed to go around saying anything they want about whomever or whenever they want.... [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]
928 words (2.7 pages)
- The Limits of Freedom Liberty is the state of being free, to be able to speak and say anything freely. Liberty was not absolute for everybody. Back then and even today people still don’t have complete liberty in America. The early Americans put limits on freedom even when they were trying to create more freedom. They type of limits that the early Americans put on freedom were limits on freedom of speech, and much more. Even with the American Revolution, it was not for everybody. The American Revolution was only for the colonist and men, but over time the idea of liberty and equality became for everyone.... [tags: Liberty, Freedom of Speech, American History]
1658 words (4.7 pages)
- ... The People’s Republic of China, a country that is neither a republic or true representative of the People, regularly cracks down on those who speak against the autocratic nature of the government. In just recent months the government has pushed hard against expat writers speaking against the PRC, going as far as to secretly kidnap authors from other countries, return them to China, and jail them without trial. As the PRC forces citizens to figuratively lock away non-conformist notions in their mind, the PRC literally locks away citizens who refuse to do so.... [tags: Democracy, Freedom of speech, Hate speech]
1053 words (3 pages)
- ... ➜ Evidence: Net neutrality is the idea that all data should be transmitted equally by Internet service providers (ISPs). This will encourage new businesses to enter the market since they will not be treated unfair by companies favoring the big customers. Also, this will make sure the users on the Internet get the right to decide and choose what they like, never forcing to choose one specific brand. ➜ Impact: Net neutrality prevents monopoly, promoted competition and put a stop to price fixing or etc, which can in the end cause inflation or deflation, and protecting consumers, investors, and savers.... [tags: Freedom of speech, Censorship, Fraud]
1348 words (3.9 pages)
- ... Regardless of the entity or citizen, freedom of speech should be treated the same across the board. How is it constitutionally acceptable to limit a corporation from spending money on a candidate that they feel portrays their beliefs or goals. After all, a corporation is made up of citizens of the United States and is a form of accumulated people. Donating to a cause or something that is believed in is making a statement and is protected by the constitution. An argument to consider is that a corporation is not an individual citizen, therefore, cannot be included in the constitution as having the same rights and protections that a natural citizen would have.... [tags: freedom, idea, belief, restrict]
535 words (1.5 pages)
- Should Freedom of the Press be Limited to Protect National Security. Every single American Citizen has their own rights and privileges, dating back to 1787 when the U.S. constitution was born. This was the first legal document stating citizen rights. Four years later, in 1791, the First Amendment was passed, stating several American citizen rights including Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Expression, the right to petition, and the right to assemble. Over the years to present day, these rights have been shifted to meet current standards.... [tags: first amendment, rights, privileges]
1381 words (3.9 pages)
- ... Source #1 states, “The writings of philosophers such as Voltaire, the Englishman John Locke, and the American Benjamin Franklin helped propel revolutions in favor of individual freedoms.” Source #2 also explains how they were open to change and added to the First Amendment & the war threats. Source #2 states, “ He also proposed laws to make the nation more secure from foreign threats”. Also sourse #2 states, “ In other words, the Sedition Act directly limited freedoms allowed in the First Amendment.” The quotes states above show how the First Amendment was open to interpretation by the changes that were made on the situations that were presented.... [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]
1499 words (4.3 pages)
- ... So why didn’t the Snyder family get the verdict to their favor by the Supreme Court but the civil court jury verdict went to their favor. As stated in the first paragraph the issue was the case was involved with the first amendment which only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction for such a case. The Supreme Court had review the case and looked at the issue brought into the case. The main issue of the case was “individual’s interest in suing to recover for the disruption of a family member’s funeral outweigh the disrupter’s First Amendment right to freedom of speech?.” So no, the individual interest of recovery cannot outweigh the First Amendment right to freedom of speech since the Free Sp... [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]
1187 words (3.4 pages)
- Freedom remains the sole basis for American society as we know it. Without freedom the great nation of America would have never been founded. To understand the true principles of freedom, one must understand the scope of the word. Philosophical freedom encompasses the ability to make choices without restraints, while political freedom is the state of being free rather than in physical confinement. Despite the importance of these ideas to our founding fathers, freedom has lost much of its importance in modern American society.... [tags: Society Politics Freedom Liberty, reform]
1307 words (3.7 pages)