In December, 1607, Captain George Kendall was the first known person to be executed in the territory, now known as the United States of America. Captain Kendall was shot by firing squad, accused of spying against the British for Spain (Green, 2005). On July 7, 1865 on the site of the current Fort McNair in Washington, D.C., four people including the first female to be executed, Mary Surratt, were hanged for co-conspiring with John Wilkes Booth in the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln (Swanson; Weinberg, 2006). More recently, Timothy McVeigh was executed on June 11, 2001 for the April, 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, that killed 168 people including 19 children and injuring hundreds more (2004). These are just a few of the thousands of examples where justice had been served, for the despicable offenses these criminals inflict on the innocent.
Currently, 35 states still impose the death penalty while 16 states, including the District of Columbia, have abolished it. Opponents of capital punishment point out that the states that allow the death penalty experienced 42 percent more murders than the states who have abolished the deat...
... middle of paper ...
...pleasure in killing our friends, neighbors, and children while they live the remainder of their lives in prison.
Seventeenth century philosopher, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) best summarized the justification for capital punishment with his theory of retributivism. In a famous passage, Kant says: “Even if a civil society resolved to dissolve itself with the consent of all its members--as might be supposed in the case of a people inhabiting an island resolving to separate and scatte
throughout the whole world--the last murderer lying in prison ought to be executed before the resolution was carried out. This ought to be done in order that every one may realize the desert of his deeds, and that blood-guiltiness may not remain on the people; for otherwise they will all be regarded as participants in the murder as a public violation of justice.” (Rachels, 2010)
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Capital Punishment loosely based assumption Capital punishment, also referred to as the death penalty, is the judicially ordered execution of a prisoner as a punishment for a serious crime, such as murder. Currently, in the United States, capital punishment is legal; however, it continues to create controversial disputes throughout the country. The first dispute revolves around the misconception that capital punishment attempts to teach society not to kill by killing. The second argument is whether society has an obligation to enforce capital punishment; thirdly, whether the death penalty is a means of vengeance or a means of justice; lastly, one of the most controversial discussions, is whe... [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
912 words (2.6 pages)
- Capital punishment has been a punitive consequence of multiple societies in many different countries over the years. The death penalty has been witnessed in many different forms, depending on the society or culture. It is viewed as an act of justice due to its deeply embedded historical tradition. Over the centuries, many cultures have used capital punishment because it ensures the safety of society. Criminals continue to use violence as their way of solving a problem. Capital punishment deters crime rates more than anything else.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
1508 words (4.3 pages)
- Capital Punishment: Is It a “Necessary” Evil. Capital punishment, also known as the “death penalty,” can be defined as a legally authorized way of killing someone. Within the Constitution, there is a section authorizing the existence of capital punishment and the conditions for convicting a person(please cite this information for clarification). Although there is a constitutional allowance for capital punishment to be used, it is not necessarily the appropriate solution to solve an issue among the prosecuted and the victim or his or her family.... [tags: Capital punishment, Crime]
2225 words (6.4 pages)
- Positive Views of Capital Punishment in America Churchmen and political idealist disagree with views for the death penalty. It is not a government mistake to have capital punishment. This form of punishment is a great asset to America. Having capital punishment is not only one of the best ways to enforce equal punishment, but it allows for continued justice. In organized detail, learn how retribution is what the death penalty is achieved, societies are accountable, and if there really is deterrence involved.... [tags: Capital punishment, Murder, Crime]
1114 words (3.2 pages)
- ... When it comes to the death penalty, most of us would readily concede that from the standpoint of morals, constitutionality and crime deterrence, it is an inadequate form of punishment. Morally speaking, our country needs to realize that the government doesn’t have the right to kill, it is plainly stated in an article taken from Bryan Stevenson,"Ultimately, the moral question surrounding capital punishment in America has less to do with whether those convicted of violent crime deserve to die than with whether state and federal governments deserve to kill those whom it has imprisoned.” This is crucial to the abolishment of the death penalty because when the government takes this type of pu... [tags: Crime, Capital punishment, Morality, Murder]
1063 words (3 pages)
- For centuries, the death penalty has been used by nations throughout the world. Practices such as stoning, the guillotine, firing squads, electrocution, and lethal injections have all been common practices to condemn criminals who had enacted heinous crimes. In concurrent society, however, capital punishment has begun to be viewed as a barbaric and inhumane. From these judgments, arguments and controversies have erupted over whether or not the United States should continue to practice the death penalty.... [tags: Capital punishment, Crime, Lethal injection]
1657 words (4.7 pages)
- Capital punishment is not a morally acceptable practice because the process has come to represent a form of torture in our modern society and therefore, should not be seen as an acceptable form of punishment for any criminal act. The goal of a punishment is to properly reprimand the criminal so justice is served in regard to the victim. This can be achieved without violating our moral standards through the use of punishments which sufficiently punish the offender while still doing right by the victim.... [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
2197 words (6.3 pages)
- The Death of Capital Punishment Capital punishment is crime done by the government perpetrate without consequence, and it must be abolished. “We’re only ¬human, we all make mistakes,” is a commonly used phrase and is actually true. Humans, as a species, inseparable from their mistakes. It is true that punishment is appropriate for someone who made mistake. However, in the case of the death penalty, error becomes too dangerous a risk. The innocent lives that have been taken with the approval of our own government should be enough to abolish capital punishment.... [tags: Capital punishment, Murder, Crime, Death row]
870 words (2.5 pages)
- ... Dead is dead. The best society can do is to posthumously apologize to them and their family for the error, but we cannot give them their life back. People want to believe that the death penalty deters crime but despite extensive research there is no definitive evidence to support this view. The biggest issue in trying to make this case is that no one can say what a jurisdictions crime rate would be with other sentencing options. Meanwhile, there are studies that have compared violent crime rates in states with the death penalty to those without the death penalty and they have shown that the death penalty does not seem to affect crime rate trends.... [tags: Crime, Capital punishment, Human rights, Prison]
1018 words (2.9 pages)
- The Problem of Capital Punishment The issue of capital punishment is a divisive topic that encompasses many moral and empirical aspects of human justice. Ultimately, the key issue regarding the death penalty is as follows: is the death penalty an appropriate form of punishment for the United States of America’s judicial system to impose. This key issue incorporates the empirical and moral claims of the opponents both for and against capital punishment in America. The main empirical issues center on whether or not the death penalty is imposed with bias, whether it serves as deterrence for future crimes, and whether it is an economically beneficial option for the country.... [tags: Government Capital Punishment Essays]
3348 words (9.6 pages)